(Video) “I hurt people, and then I make their cocaine f—ing appear,”

Sunday, May 19th, 2013

From Facebook Page – Police State USA: Land of the Checkpoints comes this chilling video of  cops berating a harmless individual. The info states the video is out of Durham. This video comes from Durham in CA. Here is a link to the recent findings by the PD according to The Star

These types of interactions with police have occurred millions of times. Thanks to the the surveillance camera in this case, and many times the risks assumed by folks like you and me holding a cellphone, we are starting to expose what we’ve been allowing these people to get away with for so long.

Please, always film police.

(Video) “I hurt people, and then I make their cocaine f—ing appear,” is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

(Video) Cop Not So Good At 5th Grade Math

Thursday, May 16th, 2013

 

In yet another not so surprising attempt and likely success at “Fuck(ing)” an innocent man, this un-named (as of yet) cop decides to double down on his idiocy.   He stated,  despite acknowledging his failure to understand the basic fundamentals of ancient through modern mathematics,  he was “gonna write my shit.”  The “shit” he is referring to is likely a sworn police report.  A .016 BAC would be expected, approximately,  for a 180ish pound man who drank 2 beers over the past 2 hours.

On the other hand, a .16 is a completely different story.  According to this online BAC calculator a 180 pound man would have to drink 9 beers in 1 hour to achieve the approximate threshold of a .16.

This cop also refers to the man as, “genius” as he mentions, “that little extra zero doesn’t mean shit.” He continues with, “You know what…fuck it…argue it in court.”

Without fail, he also threatens to “book the video recorder” (take the camera) despite having his own audio recording.

Please post this cop’s name/department in the comments and I will update appropriately.

And Please, always film police.

(Video) Cop Not So Good At 5th Grade Math is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

Police Officer Doesn’t Want to Be Filmed, Gets Aggressive

Tuesday, May 14th, 2013

Submitted by  Daniel Solomon

There isn’t much context as to what is going on in this video, but the officer’s reaction to being filmed is pretty standard – unwarranted suspicion, aggression, and violation of rights.

Police Officer Doesn’t Want to Be Filmed, Gets Aggressive is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

A Question of Justice: NYPD ‘Stop-and-Frisks’ Down First Quarter of 2013

Monday, May 13th, 2013

Submitted by Elizabeth Renter

The NYPD makes no bones about their tactic. They call it crime prevention, we call it racist violation of constitutional rights. But their “stop-and-frisk” tactics have declined for the first time in several years, raising the question – is the NYPD ready to give up this practice of criminalizing people based solely on their location and likely their race?

According to the Wall Street Journal, stop-and-frisks are down over 50 percent for the first quarter of 2013, when compared with 2012. It comes at an interesting time, as the city is facing a federal lawsuit for their employment of these practices.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of several people who were victims of the stops. In case you’re unaware of the tactic, a stop-and-frisk is when a cop sees you in a high-crime neighborhood and uses this, paired with any other loose justification, to assume you may have committed or may be about to commit a crime. The officer then detains you on the street and may frisk you or pat you down.

The stop-and-frisk approach is largely used by rookies operating in the Operation Impact program, which sends a large amount of uniformed officers into high crime neighborhoods to sort of make their presence known. If the stops were made because there was good evidence of an impending crime, it might not be so bad. But officers are using the mere reputation of neighborhood and things like clothing or loitering as evidence to justify a search. As you well may imagine, they are doing it en masse to black and Latino men.

In 2002, for instance, 85 percent of those stopped were Latino or black, and 90 percent were released without criminal charge or arrest. What does that mean? That 90 percent had done nothing wrong. This is the crux of the lawsuit. So, why are stop-and-frisks down? Ask the NYPD and they will tell you it’s a staffing issue or a training situation. Still, the lawsuit certainly can’t be ignored, and there’s a good chance that the department is quietly backing off.

Most interesting about the drop in stop-and-frisks, however, is that it comes at the same time as a drop in crime rates. Crime in the city is down 2.7 percent during the first quarter of 2013, and murders are down 30 percent. What this says is that stop-and-frisks may not have the amazing impact that the city wants you to believe. In fact, it seems, the dropping crime rate has nothing to do with the use of stop-and-frisk tactics.

So, if stop-and-frisk does not reduce crime, what does it do?

Generally, stopping people without solid justification and doing so in significantly racially-disproportionate numbers does nothing but widen the rift between a community and the police. It does nothing but justify the bitter distrust held by many people within the city. From the NYPD’s perspective, it likely serves to keep people “in their place.”

This post was originally blogged on AQuestionofJustice.com, the personal justice blog of freelance writer Elizabeth Renter. You can contact Ms. Renter through her blog or her website: www.ElizabeththeWriter.com

 

A Question of Justice: NYPD ‘Stop-and-Frisks’ Down First Quarter of 2013 is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

Bakersfield Man Dies During Arrest, Eye Witness Video Footage Confiscated

Sunday, May 12th, 2013

In an incident reminiscent of the Kelly Thomas tragedy, an unarmed Bakersfield man was killed during an attempted arrest by local law enforcement.

Kern County Sheriff’s deputies were investigating David Sal Silva for public intoxication. In total, nine officers of the Kern County Sheriff’s department and the California Highway Patrol beat Silva to death, as they claimed he resisted arrest. Several witnesses apparently captured footage of the beating on their cell phones. But, the cell phones were confiscated by deputies as evidence.

The Kern County Sheriff’s department released the following names of involved officers:

Ryan Greer
Tanner Miller
Jeffrey Kelly
Luis Almanza
Brian Brock
David Stephens

The CHP has not released the names of its officers involved in the arrest. More details here.

Bakersfield Man Dies During Arrest, Eye Witness Video Footage Confiscated is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

Former DA Jailed for Hiding Evidence to Secure Conviction

Thursday, May 9th, 2013

Former Williamson County District Attorney Ken Anderson was released on $7,500 bail for charges relating to violating state law and acting in contempt of court by lying to a trial judge. Anderson, who is now a state judge, purportedly lied to a trial judge in a murder case decades ago in order to secure a conviction.  The convicted man, Michael Morton, served almost 25 years in prison before being exonerated. Anderson had intentionally concealed two items of evidence that would have helped prove Mr. Morton’s innocence.

District Judge Louis Sterns said of Anderson, “This court cannot think of a more intentionally harmful act than a prosecutor’s conscious choice to hide mitigating evidence so as to create an uneven playing field for a defendant facing a murder charge and a life sentence,”and ruled that there was probable cause to support the charges against Anderson.

Prior to issuing his ruling, Sturns apologized to Mr. Morton on behalf of the state’s judges, which hardly makes up for the 25 years of life Mr. Morton lost as the result of wrongful incarceration. Sturns also issued a show-cause order demanding Anderson to appear in court for a criminal contempt citation. Anderson could face a $500 fine and 6 months in prison if convicted.

Anderson will appeal on statute of limitations grounds (more here).

While it is horrifying enough that this kind of thing even occurred, equally concerning is the fact that a dishonest, immoral, and power hungry prosecutor eventually became a state judge. Decades passed before anyone discovered the gravity of his past actions and pursued punitive measures. One can only imagine how many other innocent people he was convicted, and what other misdeeds Anderson has engaged in as both prosecutor, and now a judge.

Of course, it may also be entirely due to happenstance that he was ever caught in the first place, and it is very possible there are prosecutors and/or judges like him in court systems all over the country who do the exact same thing, repeatedly, and get away with it.

Such is the inherent problem of perpetuating a justice system wherein people lack choices. The system as is is one in which people are forced to fund the “justice” system even when the judges are corrupt, the prosecutors are liars, and completely innocent people rot away most of their lives in prison.

It is no surprise that when people have no alternative, and must fund the current system, that the employees within are not responsive to consumer demands.

Former DA Jailed for Hiding Evidence to Secure Conviction is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

CopBlock.org’s Question of The Week

Tuesday, May 7th, 2013

While everyone is encouraged to share stories of any police interaction they have, I am particularly interested in learning the answer to the following question, preferably in the form of a blog post.

CopBlock.org’s Question of the Week:

What has to happen, or not happen, before you would choose to stop funding police as they exist today? Please explain.

If you’d like to write a blog post in response to the Question of The Week, feel free to share your own personal story here.

If you have suggestions for future Questions of The Week, please email them to QuestionOfTheWeek[at]CopBlock[dot]org.

CopBlock.org’s Question of The Week is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

UNH Riot Squad Tests Weaponized Toys on Students

Wednesday, May 1st, 2013

The fourth Occupy New England regional convergence was held this past weekend at the University of New Hampshire’s main campus in Durham. The gathering brought together dedicated activists from around the Northeast to spend time workshopping, networking, and strategizing. In a twist of fate, riot police would descend upon the surrounding area as outdoor presentations on street medic effectiveness and bullhorn mastery occurred on the campus unh_riotpolicegreen.

Presidential candidate Vermin Supreme was about midway through a session on de-escalating tense situations when chants of ‘UNH, UNH’ were audible from down the street directly across from the audience. Moments later, riot police appeared to be blocking the road off as students poured out of the area, many bearing cell phones in a manner suggesting that they were video recording. I wandered down for a closer look, and was surprised to see multiple officers carrying paintball guns, and others holding large canisters of pepper spray, most wearing helmets with face shields, gloves, and other protective gear (short of physical riot shields). Students were compliant with requests to stay out of the area, but were clearly agitated by what had previously occurred, several students reporting to have been hit and bruised by rubber bullets (likely pepperballs). From across the road, Vermin’s voice amplified through his bullhorn, reminding everyone to stay calm, that this was only a test, and to ignore the man with the megaphone. The mood lightened lightly as the police froze momentarily and onlookers responded with laughter and applause.

Some students were disturbed by the actions of some police, who were holding pepper spray aerosols in one hand and snapping cell phone photos with the other. One officer, Thomas Kilroy of the Durham police, responded curt and defensively when asked about his documenting of a peaceful and physically cooperative crowd.

Student: Why are you taking video of us?
Kilroy: (Shrugs) Why are you, why is he taking a video of me?
Student: Because you guys are doing something wrong.
Others: For our rights…
Kilroy: (Shrugs) I can do whatever I want.

A number of students responded their distaste with that statement, to which the officer went on to specify that he is allowed to also take pictures.unhkilroy

Foot traffic piled up at the area police were holding. It appeared that people were allowed to pass into the ‘secured area’ from across the street, but when asked why the sidewalk was closed, the vague response was that there is statutory authorization to do so. “We can’t go that way, even if we live that way?,” one young woman asked. “No, they might shoot you,” one person responded. A young man whose questions were not being fully answered began to walk past the police. Thomas Kilroy grabbed a hold of his backpack, but fortunately did not arrest him. He was turned around pushed back the other way. Some friends posed for pictures with the unusual riot unh_riotcopsposepolice backdrop. Within about five minutes, the street was opened again.

Wading into the cleared area, I discovered more police, more students filming police, and a collective sense of tranquilized excitement and curiosity. Some people seeing the camera yelled out in support. “Keep it rolling!” I kept the lens fixed on near a dozen state police occupying a corner near the epicenter of the incident. Waiting there, I was able to get bits of info from passing partygoers about what had happened. I met some young men who had seen the alleged riotous behavior and were willing to speak on camera. They informed me that a standard patrol of uniformed police had come to talk to a property owner about a growing party when somebody threw “a beer bottle or beer cans”, which apparently caused police to retreat. By the young men’s account, it was between an hour and ninety minutes later that a team of about thirty riot police descended on the property and began firing rubber balls at the large crowd, and deploying pepper spray, the clouds of mist from which can be seen floating in the air from cell phone videos capturing the scene. There were multiple periods of pepperball fire as the crowd was pushed away from the area.

off_dontgiveafock

Officer Don’t-Give-A-Fuck’s nameplate

One of the most revealing videos of the raid was captured by a young woman on her cell phone. She captured numerous instances of pepperball fire and also the arrest of Jordan Mahar, a Wolfeboro resident who was detained for allegedly inciting riot. After a male officer who appears to be in charge tells her to move following the sole reported arrest of the day, the videographer takes consistent steps backward. Then, an unidentified female officer forcefully shoves her, screaming in her face to move. Her shoe comes off in the action, and she gently pleads, “My shoe, my shoe!” The officer responds by raising her voice even higher to scream, “I don’t give a FUCK!” The officer who had been previously delivering orders threw the shoe in the direction that she had been shoved. The unhriotcop_pepperballgunnameplate of the unprofessional officer is barely visible as she pushes the person holding the camera.

As shocked as many students were, it seems that there were no serious injuries despite all of the projectiles fired. There are at least two recorded fatalities in US history as a result of reckless use of these weapons by police. In 2004, Boston police killed 21 year old Victoria Snelgrove with a pepperball shot to the eye during celebrations after a Red Sox victory.

Coverage of the UNH ruckus was run in the Union Leader the following day. According to their report, police were delivering orders to flee certain areas of the campus and surrounding properties until 7:30pm. Numerous students’ video have since emerged online, some of the most revealing posted to the ShireLeaks youtube channel. The 14-minute Free Concord video embedded above features numerous angles of the action.

UNH Riot Squad Tests Weaponized Toys on Students is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

CopBlock.org’s Question Of The Week

Monday, April 29th, 2013

While everyone is encouraged to share stories of any police interaction they have, I thought it would be interesting to have a CopBlock.org Question of The Week, or prompt, for writers to work off of.

The first CopBlock.org Question of the Week is:

What are the five most effective ways to hold police accountable, in your opinion? Please explain why. (OR – Feel free to share the five most ineffective ways to hold police accountable, in your opinion.)

If you’d like to write a blog post in response to the Question of The Week, feel free to share your own personal story here.

If you have suggestions for future Questions of The Week, please email them to QuestionOfTheWeek[at]CopBlock[dot]org.

CopBlock.org’s Question Of The Week is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

The Police Officer Impeachment Act – Petition

Sunday, April 21st, 2013

This is an effort to bring an additional layer of accountability to police officers and push back against the ‘police brotherhood’ that protects them. I’m hoping this could create a system where police officers could literally be ‘voted off the island’ so to speak.

more here:  The Police Officer Impeachment Act (Petition)

Submitted by Trevor Lyman

I welcome any feedback or suggestions at my email address, lyman.trevor@gmail.com. Thank you for your consideration.

The Police Officer Impeachment Act – Petition is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights