What do you see?

Tuesday, August 16th, 2011

.

I ran across this video last month and  I was going to skip because it has no sound, no description and no way to prove the officer actually deleted the video but I thought I was still worth posting after watching it a couple times.

What I saw was at 3:23 a male, white shirt, black shorts with white stripes takes out a cell camera and starts recording the beating until the officers yell at him.

At 5:41 an officer walks over to that same male, start’s demanding for the camera and takes it

At 6:20 you see another officer walk back by the suspect pushing buttons on the camera and a couple seconds later gives the camera back.

Again with no sound and no description we have no idea what really happened. You will have to fill in the blanks yourself’s until someone steps forward and leads us to the officers involved.

What do you see? is a post from Cop Block - "Something must be done about vengeance, a badge, and a gun"

Should You Be Able To Defend Yourself Against Out Of Control Cops?

Friday, December 10th, 2010
As you watch the first video below, imagine it is your  81-year-old grandfather being beaten up by the police, while ten of your family members are standing around watching. Should you be able to use force against these cops to protect his life, or should resistance of any kind, even against obviously excessive and likely [...]

Wednesday Link Roundup

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010
In Pittsburgh, a drunk cop committed a hit-and-run against a 22-year-old man who was forced to undergo brain surgery as a result of his injuries. The DA decided not to charge the officer for fleeing the scene because he eventually came back. If that story didn’t get your blood pumping, check this one out. A few [...]

Free Marc Emery!

Thursday, August 12th, 2010
Canadian freedom activist Marc Emery is a political prisoner of the DEA. Find out how you can help him.

G20 cop assaults protestor with bike

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010
It was out of control. I am absolutely in a police state

G20 protester tells cops to “fuck off”

Thursday, June 24th, 2010
The G20 protester was apparently irate that the same cops in Toronto who are packing thousands of dollars worth of tax-subsidized weaponry are ensuring that the people who paid for them are unarmed. So he goes off on them.

Olympic security guards create imaginary rules regarding photography

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

By Carlos Miller
Oh Canada, you guys are so civil compared to Americans.

In the above video, you will hear (unfortunately not see) an exchange between a videographer and a security guard in front of Vancouver Olympic Centre where the 2010 Winter Olympics are being held.

The guard politely tells the videographer that he is not allowed to take photos or shoot video, even though he is standing outside the stadium on public property.

She claims he is forbidden because he is standing “inside the perimeter,” which apparently is some imaginary area she conceived on the spot.

She also tells him that if he wants to continue shooting, he needs to clear it with their “media person.”

The videographer, Stephen Hui from a Vancouver website called the Georgia Straight, informs her that he is not accredited, so the media person probably wouldnt’ authorize it anyway. He is obviously convinced that you need credentials for shooting video outside the stadium.

The security guard ends up politely escorting him away from the area.

And he politely allows her to escort him outside the imaginary perimeter.

She even apologizes as she lies to him about the rules.

It wasn’t until Hui got back to his computer and uploaded the video that he allowed his true feelings to emerge, calling her an “overzealous guard.”

It turned out, that was the third time he had been harassed for shooting video that day.

He was so distraught over the incidents that he politely called a spokesperson for the Olympic security unit.

And was politely informed that they were all talking out of their asses.

The streets and sidewalks surrounding the Vancouver Olympic Centre are not off-limits to photography, according to a spokesperson for the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit.

“Basically, there’s no rule saying that photos can’t be taken from the public, because we have no control over that,” RCMP Const. Carol Blannin said yesterday (February 10) by phone. “Once you’re inside the venue, then there are definite rules for each venue, per se.”

Blannin made her comments the day after this Georgia Straight journalist heard a very different message while circumnavigating the 2010 Olympics’ curling venue at Hillcrest Park.

Related posts:

  1. Washington DC security guards clueless about photographers’ rights By Carlos Miller A television news crew was conducting a...
  2. L.A. photogs harassed and threatened by U.S. Bank security guards Update: Villarin and some photographer friends will be returning to...
  3. Nevada casino security guards illegally detain man after taking photos The photo that got Robert Woolley illegally detained by...

Motorhome Diaries crew facing fresh border thuggery

Monday, August 3rd, 2009


At least for the moment, Jason Talley still has Twitter access.

I’m unlikely to be able to follow this closely, so follow Jason on Twitter (@JDTalley) and Pete (@peteeyre) if you haven’t already. Also, tracking the #MHD tag on Twitter is a way to get the news, especially if the boys go silent.

From Jason’s tweets, reverse-chronological:

  1. We will now be escorted into a new holding area. This time it’s the U.S. government. 16 minutes ago
  2. Reinforcements have been called. Homeland Security vehicle is now blocking MARV. 19 minutes ago
  3. U.S. Border Guard told @peteeyre to stop recording or his camera would be confiscated. 21 minutes ago
  4. Now we are getting hassled by U.S. Border Guards in Detroit. #MHD 23 minutes ago
  5. Canadian border guards are tossing our motorhome again. I just cleaned it. about 2 hours ago
  6. We’re in the no man’s land between Detroit and Windsor, Canada… on accident. Wrong turns suck. about 2 hours ago

Gak.

Love it? Hate it? Share it!Facebook Twitter MySpace del.icio.us StumbleUpon Sphinn Tumblr Fark Yahoo! Buzz Live Digg Reddit Mixx Google Bookmarks E-mail this story to a friend!


Tags: border, Canada, homeland security, Jason Talley, MHD, Motorhome Diaries, Pete Eyre, Twitter

Related posts

Wednesday Lazy Linking

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009
  • … but the streets belong to the people! Jesse Walker, Hit & Run (2009-06-10): The People’s Stop Sign. In which people in an Ottawa neighborhood take nonviolent direct action to slow down the traffic flying down their neighborhood streets — by putting up their own stop signs at a key intersection. The city government, of course, is now busy with a Criminal Investigation of the public’s heinous contribution to public safety.

  • Abolitionism is the radical notion that other people are not your property. Darian Worden (2009-06-09): The New Abolitionists The point is that the principles of abolitionism, which held that regardless of popular justifications no human is worthy to be master and no human can be owned by another, when carried to their logical conclusion require this: that no human is worthy of authority over another, and that no person is owed allegiance simply because of political status. When reason disassembles the popular justifications of statism, as advances in political philosophy since the 1850’s have assisted in doing, the consistent abolitionist cannot oppose the voluntaryist principles of the Keene radicals.

  • Mr. Obama, Speak For Yourself. Thomas L. Knapp, Center for a Stateless Society (2009-09-09): Speaking of the State

  • A campaign of isolated incidents. Ellen Goodman, Houston Chronicle (2009-06-08): Sorry, but the doctor’s killer did not act alone

  • Let’s screw all the little guys. Just to be fair. (Or, pay me to advertise my product on your station.) Jesse Walker, Reason (2009-06-09): The Man Can’t Tax Our Music: The music industry wants to impose an onerous new fee on broadcasters.

  • Some dare call it torture. Just not the cops. Or the judges. Wendy McElroy, WendyMcElroy.com (2009-06-08): N.Y. Judge Rules that Police Can Taser Torture in order to coerce compliance with any arbitrary court order. I think that Wendy is right to call pain compliance for what it is — torture (as I have called it here before) — and that it is important to insist on this point as much as possible whenever the topic comes up.

  • On criminalizing compassion. Macon D., stuff white people do (2009-06-05), on the conviction of Walt Staton for knowingly littering water jugs in a wildlife refuge, in order to keep undocumented immigrants from dying in the desert.

  • Freed markets vs. deforesters. Keith Goetzman, Utne Reader Environment (2009-06-04): Do You Know Where Your Shoes Have Been?, on the leather industry and the destruction of the Amazon rainforest. Utne does a good job of pointing out (by quoting Grist’s Tom Philpott) that the problem is deeply rooted in multi-statist neoliberalism: because of the way in which the Brazilian government and the World Bank act together to subsidize the cattle barons and ‘roid up Brazilian cattle ranching, the report is really about the perils of using state policy to prop up global, corporate-dominated trade.

  • Well, Thank God. (Cont’d.) Thanks to the Lord Justice, we now know that Pringles are, in fact, officially potato chips, not mere savory snacks, in spite of the fact that only about 40% of a Pringles crisp is actually potato flour. Language Log takes this case to demonstrate the quasi-Wittgensteinian point that, fundamentalist legal philosophy to one side, there’s actually no such thing as a self-applying law. (Quoting Adam Cohen’s New York Times Op-Ed, Conservatives like to insist that their judges are strict constructionists, giving the Constitution and statutes their precise meaning and no more [linguists groan here], while judges like [Sonia] Sotermayor are activists. But there is no magic way to interpret terms like free speech or due process — or potato chip.) I think the main moral of the story has to do with the absurdity of a political system in which whether or not you can keep $160,000,000 of your own damn money rides on whether or not you can prove to a judge that your savory snack hasn’t got the requisite potatoness to count as a potato crisp for the purposes of law and justice.

  • Small riots will get small attention, no riots get no attention, make a big riot, and it will be handled immediately. Loretta Chao, Wall Street Journal (2009-05-30): In China, a New Breed of Dissidents. The story makes it seem as though the most remarkable thing about the emerging dissident movement is that they are safe enough for the State to tolerate them, rather than launching all out assaults as they did against the Tienanmen dissidents in 1989. Actually, I think that that misses the point entirely; and that the most interesting thing is that they have adopted such flexible and adaptive networking, both tactically and strategically, and that they now so often rise up from the very social classes that the Chinese Communist Party claims to speak for (not just easily-demonized students and intelligentsia, but ordinary farmers, factory workers, and retirees) — that the regime isn’t tolerating them; it just no longer knows what to do with them.

  • Counter-Cooking and Mutual Meals. Julia Levitt, Worldchanging: Bright Green (2009-06-03): Community Kitchens (Via Kevin Carson’s Shared Items.) If I may recommend, if you’re going to work on any kind of community cooking like this, particularly if you’re interested in it partly for reasons of resiliency and building community alternatives, you should do what you can to make sure that it is strongly connected with the local grey-market solidarity economy, through close cooperation with your local Food Not Bombs (as both a source and a destination for food) and other local alternatives to the state-subsidized corporate-consumer model for food distribution.

  • Looking Forward. Shawn Wilbur, In the Libertarian Labyrinth (009-06-06): Clement M. Hammond on Police Insurance. An excerpt on policing in a freed society, from individualist anarchist Clement M. Hammond’s futurist utopian novel, Then and Now which originally appeared in serialized form in Tucker’s Liberty in 1884 and 1885. (Thus predating Bellamy’s dreary Nationalist potboiler by 4 years.) Hammond’s novel is now available in print through Shawn’s Corvus Distribution. The good news is that, while Bellamy’s date of 2000 has already mercifully passed us by without any such society emerging, we still have almost 80 years to get it together in time for Hammond’s future.

  • Here at Reason we never pass up a chance to have some fun at the expense of Pete Seeger. Jesse Walker, Hit & Run (2009-06-09): They Wanna Hear Some American Music. On brilliant fakery, the invention of Country and Western music, the cult of authenticity, and the manufacture of Americana. For the long, full treatment see Barry Mazor, No Depression (2009-02-23): Americana, by any other name…

  • Anarchy on the Big Screen. Colin Firth and Kevin Spacey have signed on for a big-screen film adaptation of Homage to Catalonia. The film is supposed to enter production during the first half of 2010.

Technological civilization is awesome. (Cont’d.)

Communications

Wednesday Lazy Linking

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

Communications: